Review by Anna on July 11, 2010.

I have not read any reviews of this album but I have a feeling this would have caused a few severely split opinions. I find this "split opinion" even within myself. I try to be as unbiased as possible in reviews and life as much as I can help it, but this is the type of "situation" where you catch yourself being human.

I will lay down the "absolutes" of this album first: It's dark, "eerie", there are keyboards, cello, "female vocals", and they seem to classify themselves as "Death Doom" and "Funeral Doom".

The first time I listened to this I was not actually writing the review, like I usually do. In retrospect, I realize that my first opinion was largely a reaction... to the ideas and information that was already "in place". I felt, and still feel, that the music is bland, the composition undeveloped and UNenticing, and that all the clean vocals are insufficient in quality for what the music "calls for". But why my negative reaction completely stomped out any room for a positive viewpoint at first was because of this: The genre classification, which I wholeheartedly disagree with, lead me to "see" the music AS, and compare it TO, said genre and its "doings". As such I did not see the music for what it was, which to me is nothing short of (or "nothing more than" if you prefer) "Gothic Metal" with funereal elements. If they were going for Funeral Doom they have failed miserably. The key to this was PERSPECTIVE, and perspective can and often does make all the difference.

The second time around my head was not so wrapped up in the information provided, and I was able to find a few nice things within the music. I always did think the "piano" parts were beautiful, even if the main melodies are too EASY to comprehend, but this time I was able to sense a few decent ones as well that HAVE potential. I was even able to "feel" the music for a few moments the second time around. Despite these few "positives" and the fancy "frills" of the album, as I implied earlier, there is no TENSION in the music. What I'm about to say is X-rated so please skip the rest of this paragraph if you are not comfortable. It feels like a LOUSY HANDJOB that does not need to BE one. There is no variation nor sensitivity of touch in the "stroking", AKA composition, and the "emotion" is not convincing. Even a bad handjob feels better than no handjob, but come on guys, it's time to bust out the passion and baby oil and MAKE US WHIMPER. I BEG YOU.

As so many are jumping on this Death/Doom/Dark bandwagon with little success, I naturally have my suspicions on intent. Time will tell, and those who know will know. But I just couldn't help but to draw two parallels that have me raising an eyebrow. The title of this album as well as the choice of cover song, somehow are a little too reminiscent of two 2005 releases, also from this very country and "genre".

Categorical Rating Breakdown

Musicianship: 5.9
Atmosphere: 9
Production: 8
Originality: 5
Overall: 5.9

Rating: 6.8 out of 10

Review by David on February 13, 2005.

Let’s just ignore Danzig’s extra-curricular activities for the moment and look at his musical output of late. We all know that’s been largely sub-par; we lost the great bluesy drawl that made his best albums so sublime, and his amazing, soulful voice got distorted under the weight of studio trickery. Tracks as devastatingly beautiful as "How the Gods Kill" and "Going Down to Die" became a thing of the past as the Evil Elvis wrapped himself in a cocoon of the all-too-modern. Now we arrive at album eight and the last bit of tradition is out of the window; there are no more numbers kids, it’s just Circle of Snakes.

I’m sure opener "Wotan’s Possession" is meant to be the scene-setter; the eerie intro to a soundtrack of bleak and soulful metal. What it actually sounds like is an Oompa-Loompa death march (no dwarf-related jokes please). It’s time to bear witness to another disappointment; apparently the guy still has his finger on the pulse, little realising that the pulse stopped when the body died about a decade ago.

The second warning sign is the obvious lack of effort spent on recording the album. The guitars sound like the audio equivalent of processed cheese. The dense tone is too heavy on the bass and makes some rather natty riffs sound lazy and stilted. Meanwhile the drums don’t fair any better, sounding tinny and weak, for a while I thought I was listening to a shoddy MP3 rip. The whole thing literally sounds cheap and muddy.

And sadly, Danzig himself doesn’t sound like the damn scary dude he used to. His voice has just lost that deeper and natural timbre that made him sound so … Danzig. The majority of the singing sounds forced and desperately strained, something evidenced clearly in "Hellmask" with its wide-open, up-tempo verses calling for a great Glenn holler but getting a forced yelp. Maybe it should be expected as time takes its toll, but what is a Danzig album without those stunning and imperious vocals? I suppose it’s a good thing then that his vocals aren’t dominating the mix anymore, even if it is a sad sign of the times.

Song-wise there are some really good ideas on this record with "1000 Devils Reign" harking back to the past in a way that would have probably seen it sneak its way onto a classic album, had it been recorded with a bit more care. In contrast the likes of "Night, Besodom" sound thin on the ground and hastily thrown together with tedious and clumsy structuring. Of course one can’t throw all the blame at the main man. I just don’t see Tommy Victor as a musical match for him; he just doesn’t have that bluesy spark John Christ used to great effect and consequentially the guitars lack a distinct personality.

Basically, this could have been a solid if unspectacular regain of some form. It’s sad to say this, but the album is lacking in so many ways that it’s just another disappointment. I’m calling time on the poison dwarf, and I’m thankful I’ve got long enough legs that I could probably outrun him.

Categorical Rating Breakdown

Musicianship: 5
Atmosphere: 4
Production: 3
Originality: 4
Overall: 5

Rating: 4.2 out of 10